Hi again, doesn't the output from "apt-cache policy" guarantee that (see my first message)? I mean, the "version table" I get relates the stable package and its location, but the unstable (or whatever that is!) is also there... The whole problem is that the installed version won't be downgraded to the one that is on the sources related to stable. There HAS got to be a way of doing this, some kind of forcing option or something. This is driving me mad, since I can't install some other packages and compile programs that need them :( Thanks for your time, Roberto. PS: Again, I am still not on the list, so I ask you to CC any answers to me too, thanks.
On Wed, 4 Aug 2004 16:17:34 +0200 (CEST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello, > > Well, there might be something wrong here, but this is what i get: > > ######################## > > $ apt-get dist-upgrade > > Reading Package Lists... Done > > Building Dependency Tree... Done > > Calculating Upgrade... Done > > 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. > > ######################## > > so, still no luck. > > But thanks for the try! > > Roberto. > > PS: I am still not on the list, so I ask you to CC any answers to me > > too, thanks. > > > You could try to see if all dependecies are available on the server you > are trying to install from. > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
