Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > John L Fjellstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I was wondering if Linux can be considered Unix? > > It is a flavor of unix is general, if that's what you're asking. You > won't be at a complete loss on other unix systems.
Is there a semantic difference between being like something or a clone of something, and being that thing in the English language? I'm just thinking of the statement, GNU's Not Unix. Does that mean that GNU/Linux is a OS with unix like functionality, kinda like Windows with Service For Unix, or OS/2 with its POSIX layer, or is GNU/Linux an unix. Kinda like, Kleenex is both a brand of tissue and the generic name for tissues. Is the same true for unix? -- John L. Fjellstad web: http://www.fjellstad.org/ Quis custodiet ipsos custodes -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]