On 2004-07-12, Steve Lamb penned: > > I'm not sure what Karsten had in mind here but let me give my > first hand view on this piece. My current employment gives me > access to TMDA in production use. In one instance a client of > ours gets over 9,000 messages *a day*. Virtually all of it is > spam. They have configured TMDA to C-R. So follow the math.
Implementing a C/R system without first running the mail through some spam detection system is horribly irresponsible. As they're you're client, I hope you're making some effort to educate them and/or provide them with that option. [snip] > Mind you that the offical TMDA party line might be to use it as > part of a grander scheme I believe it is; at least, most of the folks on the tmda mailing list believe this. I don't know if it's explicitly stated in the docs. TMDA also implements nifty things like dated and keyword addresses, btw. I honestly don't know if these are available through other sources. > but some people have come here to this list to tell those of us > with a little clue that C-R (in particular their broken > implementation, not TMDA) was far superior than spam filtering and > that spam filtering simple was not needed and a waste. That's unfortunate. -- monique -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
