On 16 Jun 2004, Antony wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm using spamassassin 2.63 in unstable. In the last month or two, much > more spam seems to get through. Here's an example: > > >From fetchmail Wed Jun 16 11:36:56 2004 > Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Received: from 66.179.181.35 [66.179.181.35] > by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-6.2.5) > for [EMAIL PROTECTED] (single-drop); Wed, 16 Jun 2004 11:36:56 > +0100 (BST)
[snip] For many months now I've been using spamprobe, which I find better than spamassassin. Easy to set up and not more than one or two false negatives a day; no false positives at all. I don't know why spamprobe receives less publicity than the compettion but it's better than all the others I've tried. There's a good mailling list to which the author contributes frequently. There is a deb but I generally compile from source and put it in /usr/local. Anthony -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] || http://www.acampbell.org.uk using Linux GNU/Debian || for book reviews, electronic Windows-free zone || books and skeptical articles -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
