On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 11:13:50AM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote: > Micha Feigin wrote: > > and they do require more cpu, eye candy takes cpu power to draw (either > > real cpu or graphic card cpu, either way, battery power). It also > > requires more memory accesses each time you need to redraw parts of the > > screen to access bitmaps, calculate transparencies, build gradients, ... > > > Maybe if you work full screen with the panels hidden it wouldn't take > > more cpu power assuming everything was coded properly. > > Or you could, I dunno.... TURN THEM OFF. Options, amazing things. >
And in such scenarios I find other window managers much more suiting for the task. And if you go into options how do I make a custom menu with gnome, or don't they think I may WANT THEM. > -- > Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your > PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | main connection to the switchboard of souls. > -------------------------------+--------------------------------------------- > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > This Mail Was Scanned By Mail-seCure System > at the Tel-Aviv University CC. > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
