Micha Feigin wrote:
> No, but the cpu cycles required to handle all the overhead do take more
> power (more memory usually means someone is using it, otherwise it
> really is bloatware), and yes its the cpu that is causing the power
> consumption (and even if you do use accelerated graphics to reduce cpu
> work, then it would be the graphics card that takes to power, and newer
> laptop graphic chips can also scale power consumption according to usage)
Now you're just spreading FUD. I could write a script that would load up
200Mb of data and then just sit there calling sleep. Stuff loaded into RAM
doesn't equate to CPU consumption, sorry.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
-------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
