CaT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said on Tue, 15 Jun 2004 16:14:37 +1000: > On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 02:50:43PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote: > > s. keeling wrote: > > > I gave up on both of those; they're equally uncontrollable, and far > > > too fat to leave any room for actual applications to run. ymmv. > > > > Could've fooled me. > > > > KDE + Squid + Addzapper + other stuff... > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~} free > > total used free shared buffers cached > > Mem: 775556 767612 7944 0 131368 392300 > > -/+ buffers/cache: 243944 531612 > > Swap: 655344 26600 628744 > > > > 531Mb's not enough? Hmph.
Gee, the biggest workstation I have access to only has 1GB ram. Aren't you lucky? > It's more of a case of 'Isn't 240Mb (or 200 cos of squid) a bit much for > a pretty desktop?' ;) Especially if you only have 256MB ram (think: anything more than 1 year old - ie, what the majority of us own). The day some idiot breaks X irreperably for Fvwm users in favour of some fancy new shiny crap, is the day I leave Linux. -- TimC -- http://astronomy.swin.edu.au/staff/tconnors/ cat /kat/ n. A furry keyboard cover -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
