Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I agree with and do a most of what you and others say.  The *only* place
> I think T-bird is more efficient is for my case of a large number of
> mail folders with three levels of structure visible simultaneously on
> the screen.  After I choose the folder with the mouse I could easily use
> a mutt style interface.
>
> Faster as far as processor time, etc. is not relevant *if the machine is
> fast enough* since the machine still has to wait for the user to do
> something.

I don't know about that.  I've found that mutt is one of the painfully
slowest MUAs around (at least at loading large Maildirs or IMAP folders)
even on very fast computers...

-- 
You win again, gravity!


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to