Chris Metzler wrote:
On Mon, 07 Jun 2004 11:55:05 +0000Now I am all :S
Simon L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Chris Metzler wrote:
On Mon, 07 Jun 2004 09:02:43 +0000direct rendering: Yes
Simon L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I will take a concrete example: "Tuxracer". I can run it (at approx 1frame/sec).Whoa. If you're only getting 1 fps on tuxracer, that strongly suggests
you're using software rendering rather than hardware. Can you run
"glxinfo" and see what it says for "direct rendering"?
OK, let's forget tuxracer for a second. Can you run "glxgears" from a terminal? In that terminal, it will give fps counts. What do you get?
-c
It wrote 362.600 FPS so I said to myself "how come". I ran "Tuxracer" and now it works...
I don't know what happened, I don't know what I did, but now it works. 3 Hours before it didn't worked and now it works...
If only I knew what happened.
Thanks anyway, I'm so happy now :D
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]