On Sat, 2004-06-05 at 18:24, Paul Scott wrote:
> Simon Kitching wrote:
>
> >On Sat, 2004-06-05 at 15:42, dircha wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Simon Kitching wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>You sound like someone who has probably thought of this as the possible
> >>cause of the problem, but did you upgrade your kernel as well?
> >>
> >Nope.
> >
> >
> But did the dist-upgrade upgrade the kernel? If you had previously
> installed a kernel-image it might have been upgraded.
Sorry, I should have been more explicit. Here's the output of "uname -a"
on the "bad" version (linefeed in the middle inserted by me):
Linux pcsimon 2.4.26-1-686 #1
Sat May 1 18:04:05 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
and here's the output I see after booting into the backed-up
(pre-upgrade) version of debian. It's identical:
Linux pcsimon 2.4.26-1-686 #1
Sat May 1 18:04:05 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
I can also confirm that command
diff -r /boot /mnt/hda6/boot
reports no differences except the tweaks I manually applied to get the
OS booting on the backup [/mnt/hda6 points to the partition containing
the "bad" upgraded version].
I think that between them, these tests (/boot contents and uname output
unchanged) demonstrate that the kernel of the good and bad (upgraded)
systems are identical, right?
Regards,
Simon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
