hi paul

On Fri, 25 Oct 2002, Paul Johnson wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 01:37:56AM -0700, Alvin Oga wrote:
> > -- i use errror message 553 for these
> > -- if they send me prescription spam...
> > -- if they send me credit repair scheme...
> > -- if they send me get rich quick scheme...
> > -- you get the idea ..
> 
> 553 means too many recipients according to the RFC.

i plead ignorant... i didnt go lookup the error codes
before using it... just copied a few other messages i found
and exploded it to my version

and it seems to do the job .. based on what i see in the log files

thanx
alvin

> The explaination in the RFC for 571 is the reason I suggested it:
> 
>        571   Delivery not authorized, message refused
> 
>           The sender is not authorized to send to the destination.
>           This can be the result of per-host or per-recipient
>           filtering.  This memo does not discuss the merits of any
>           such filtering, but provides a mechanism to report such.
> 
> Seems this is the One True RBL Bounce Error...
> 
> -- 
> Baloo


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to