On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 11:08:46AM +1000, Russell wrote: > Michael Olds wrote: > > > > Thank you, > > > > I am still in a fog in terms of simple things like symlinks. What you want > > is to end up with a link in the linux directory called kernel-source-2.4.18 > > that links to /usr/src/kernel-source-2.4.18. So how should that be said? > > > > [ ]1.d create a symbolic link to kernel-source-2.4.18 from /usr/src/linux > > $ ln -s /usr/src/kernel-source-2.4.18 /usr/src/linux > > No. I don't know if you even *need* the linux symlink. But if you > do, the symlink is /usr/src/linux and it points to /usr/src/kernel-source-2.4.18.
AFAIK, the symlink is mostly used when compiling source which looks for headers in /usr/src/linux/include. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
