On 0, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Monday 30 September 2002 19:04, Tom Cook wrote: > > #include <qt/qapplication.h> > > #include <qt/qlabel.h> > > #include <qt/qstring.h> > > > > then you should be able to compile with: > > > > g++ -c -o helloworld.o helloworld.cpp > > > > Note also that the usual (proper?) way of naming C++ source is *.cc or > > *.cxx, not *.cpp like M$ do. > > > > Tom > > actually cpp is a valid and common extension. In fact both qt and kde use it > for their own projects. I happen to use .cc but no use getting into a naming > scuffle.
No, it's not worth it. I was just looking at the g++ man page that lists .cc and .cxx but not .cpp. Regards Tom -- Tom Cook Information Technology Services, The University of Adelaide Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience. Get my GPG public key: https://pinky.its.adelaide.edu.au/~tkcook/tom.cook-at-adelaide.edu.au
msg04523/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
