On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 09:46:13AM -0400, John Keimel wrote: > On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 03:17:56PM +0300, Ted Bukov wrote: > > I got the last 2.4.20 kernel with apt-get install. I want to patch > > it with grsec, but I met many times the follow message: "Reversed > > (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n]" When I > > answered "yes" to all questions, the kernel compilation had failed. > > I think grsec patch have conficts with already patched debian kernel > > source, so is there any debian kernel sources with grsec applied? I > > don't want to use plain (vanilla) kernel, because of its ptrace > > vulnerability. > I know that I had some issues when I put together my kernel, but I got > them resolved. Turned out that my kernel, at the time, wasn't proved > to be supported by grsec, yet. > > Looking at the downloads section of grsecurity's website, > www.grsecurity.net and notice their latest version was published only > two days ago, grsecurity-1.9.9g-2.4.20.patch .
Bah. That's typical. Just after I upload a 1.9.9f
kernel-patch-2.4-grsecurity package they update the patch. I'll try to
get a g release uploaded in the next few days.
FWIW the kernel-patch-2.4-grsecurity 1.9.9f package is against Debian's
kernel-source-2.4.20 package, so doesn't include the ptrace fix as
that's in the kernel-source package. If you're seeing issues with this
combination (and I can't tell if this is the case or not from the
original post), then please do file a bug. The 1.9.9e release didn't
have this removed, so if you were using an old version of the package
try the latest one.
J. (kernel-patch-2.4-grsecurity maintainer)
--
/------------------------------------\
| Allow me to introduce my selves. |
| http://www.blackcatnetworks.co.uk/ |
\------------------------------------/
pgp88B0UGoMhM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
