Quoting Michael Stone ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > What name calling? There's a difference.
<snort> Cute. Ah, well. > You're assuming unrestricted outbound connections. Might even be true in > your environment. It's true that there will be interim problems with corporate firewalls (etc.) closing off outbound access to 587/tcp (but allowing access to 25/tcp). Should diminish over time. I suppose that's why alternatives like POP-before-SMTP persist. [SRS references:] > Not applicable. That requires not only a change on the part of the > organization implementing SPF, but also a change at any location where a > user wants to send mail. Not really, only relays. On relay sites, implementation requires installing /usr/bin/srs (the Perl Mail::SRS module) or equivalent, then using it as a wrapper for .forward and /etc/alias entries. Over the longer term, it may end up being supported inline in MTAs. Ditto for SPF itself. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
