On Sat, 11 Sep 2010 06:33:42 -0400 (EDT), Matthijs Kooijman wrote: > Stephen Powell wrote: >> Matthijs Kooijman wrote: >>> Never mind, we've managed to test this in an emulator already. >> Sorry for the slow response. > > No problem, I know how it is. I didn't mean to sound bitter, just wanted > to prevent double work :-)
Understood. And thank you. By the way, I am just an ordinary user of Debian for s390. I am not a member of the s390 port team or the installer team and do not speak for either of them. Bastian and his teammates are busier than a one-armed wallpaper hanger in the spring right now, trying to get Squeeze out the door; so if I can help people out on the list, I try to do that. If I make any inaccurate statements, I trust that Bastian or someone else will correct me. > In the meanwhile, the packages concerned have all been succesfully > rebuilt with some endian-ness changes, so everything is ok again :-) I'm glad you have things working now. As you discovered, s390 is a "big-endian" architecture, as compared, for example, with i386, which is a "little-endian" architecture. -- .''`. Stephen Powell : :' : `. `'` `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
