debian-s390  

Messages by Thread

• Bug#1128581: RM: r-cran-fs [armel armhf i386 s390x] -- ROM; Does not build on 32bit / big endian any more Andreas Tille
• s390x buildd machines Pranav P
  • Re: s390x buildd machines Sebastiaan Couwenberg
  • RE: s390x buildd machines Pranav P
  • Re: s390x buildd machines Sebastiaan Couwenberg
  • Aw: RE: s390x buildd machines Sarah Julia Kriesch
  • Re: Aw: RE: s390x buildd machines Pranav P
  • Re: Aw: RE: s390x buildd machines Philipp Kern
  • Re: Aw: RE: s390x buildd machines Elizabeth K. Joseph
  • Re: Aw: RE: s390x buildd machines Philipp Kern
• Bug#1127741: mrpt FTBFS on big endian Adrian Bunk
• Bug#1127589: glibc/s390x still build depends on removed g{cc,++}-15-multilib Adrian Bunk
• Bug#1127019: RM: xserver-xorg-input-keyboard [amd64 arm64 armel armhf i386 mips64el mipsel ppc64el riscv64 s390x] -- RoQA; This driver is for Hurd only and should not be build on Linux architecture Andreas Tille
• Bug#1126861: vtk9: bigendian (s390x) pyvista triggers segfault in vtkMatplotlibMathTextUtilities::RenderOneCell Drew Parsons
• Bug#1071518: paraview: s390x test failure: vtkClientServerStream::Invoke stream_value invalid Drew Parsons
• Another package for s390 only: openssl-ibmca Andreas Tille
  • Re: Another package for s390 only: openssl-ibmca Pranav P
  • Re: Another package for s390 only: openssl-ibmca Andreas Tille
  • RE: Another package for s390 only: openssl-ibmca Pranav P
  • Re: Another package for s390 only: openssl-ibmca Andreas Tille
  • RE: Another package for s390 only: openssl-ibmca Pranav P
  • Re: Another package for s390 only: openssl-ibmca Andreas Tille
  • RE: Another package for s390 only: openssl-ibmca Pranav P
• Bug#1126330: drawterm: FTBFS on non x86: (cd posix-$arch && make) - "can't cd to posix-..." Sebastian Ramacher
• Bug#1126312: golang-1.25: FTBFS on s390x: TestTSAN: ThreadSanitizer: CHECK failed: tsan_platform_linux.cpp:571 Tianon Gravi
  • Re: Bug#1126312: golang-1.25: FTBFS on s390x: TestTSAN: ThreadSanitizer: CHECK failed: tsan_platform_linux.cpp:571 Pranav P
  • Re: Bug#1126312: golang-1.25: FTBFS on s390x: TestTSAN: ThreadSanitizer: CHECK failed: tsan_platform_linux.cpp:571 Tianon Gravi
  • RE: Bug#1126312: golang-1.25: FTBFS on s390x: TestTSAN: ThreadSanitizer: CHECK failed: tsan_platform_linux.cpp:571 Pranav P
  • RE: Bug#1126312: golang-1.25: FTBFS on s390x: TestTSAN: ThreadSanitizer: CHECK failed: tsan_platform_linux.cpp:571 Pranav P
• Bug#1126263: llvm-toolchain-21: Please enable libunwind on s390x, from llvm 15+ Michael R. Crusoe
• Bug#1125945: RM: sysbench [riscv64 s390x] -- ANAIS; no longer built on these architectures Jeroen Ploemen
• Bug#1125942: strace: FTBFS on armhf, s390x Chris Hofstädtler
• Bug#1125738: s390x-tools FTCBFS: builds for the build architecture Helmut Grohne
• Bug#1125702: RM: megapixels [i386 loong64 ppc64el s390x] -- ROM; not relevant on those architectures Arnaud Ferraris
• Bug#1125700: RM: qrtr [i386 ppc64el riscv64 s390x] -- ROM; not relevant on those architectures Arnaud Ferraris
• Bug#1125669: zlib: build-depends on gcc-multilib [s390x], which will get removed (needs coordination) Aurelien Jarno
• Bug#1125360: gcc-snapshot: please disable multilib support on s390x Aurelien Jarno
• Bug#1125356: gcc-13: please disable multilib support on s390x Aurelien Jarno
• Bug#1125359: gcc-16: please disable multilib support on s390x Aurelien Jarno
• Bug#1125357: gcc-14: please disable multilib support on s390x Aurelien Jarno
• Bug#1125358: gcc-15: please disable multilib support on s390x (needs coordination) Aurelien Jarno
• Bug#1125355: gcc-12: please disable multilib support on s390x Aurelien Jarno
• Bug#1125354: gcc-11: please disable multilib support on s390x Aurelien Jarno
• Bug#1125266: adios2: examples fail on s390x (bigendian) Drew Parsons
• Bug#1125254: llvm-toolchain-snapshot: build-depends on g++-multilib [s390x], which will get removed Aurelien Jarno
• Bug#1125251: llvm-toolchain-19: build-depends on g++-multilib [s390x], which will get removed Aurelien Jarno
• Bug#1125253: llvm-toolchain-21: build-depends on g++-multilib [s390x], which will get removed Aurelien Jarno
• Bug#1125252: llvm-toolchain-20: build-depends on g++-multilib [s390x], which will get removed Aurelien Jarno
• Bug#1125250: llvm-toolchain-18: build-depends on g++-multilib [s390x], which will get removed Aurelien Jarno
• Bug#1125248: llvm-toolchain-14: build-depends on g++-multilib [s390x], which will get removed Aurelien Jarno
• Bug#1125249: llvm-toolchain-17: build-depends on g++-multilib [s390x], which will get removed Aurelien Jarno
• Bug#1125247: s390-tools: build-depends on gcc-multilib [s390x], which will get removed Aurelien Jarno
• Bug#1125246: strace: build-depends on gcc-multilib [s390x], which will get removed Aurelien Jarno
• Bug#1125245: mold: build-depends on gcc-multilib [s390x], which will get removed Aurelien Jarno
• Bug#1125244: libnss-extrausers: build-depends on gcc-multilib [s390x], which will get removed Aurelien Jarno
• Bug#1125242: aflplusplus: build-depends on gcc-multilib [s390x], which will get removed Aurelien Jarno
• Bug#1125101: RM: xpra [armhf i386] -- RoQA; not built since 2023, still depends on pre-t64 libraries Simon McVittie
• Could someone of the s390 porters have a look at s390-tools Andreas Tille
  • Re: Could someone of the s390 porters have a look at s390-tools Pranav P
  • Re: Could someone of the s390 porters have a look at s390-tools Andreas Tille
  • RE: Could someone of the s390 porters have a look at s390-tools Pranav P
  • Re: Could someone of the s390 porters have a look at s390-tools Andreas Tille
  • RE: Could someone of the s390 porters have a look at s390-tools Pranav P
  • Re: Could someone of the s390 porters have a look at s390-tools Andreas Tille
  • RE: Could someone of the s390 porters have a look at s390-tools Pranav P
  • Re: Could someone of the s390 porters have a look at s390-tools Andreas Tille
  • RE: Could someone of the s390 porters have a look at s390-tools Pranav P
  • Re: Could someone of the s390 porters have a look at s390-tools Andreas Tille
  • RE: Could someone of the s390 porters have a look at s390-tools Pranav P
  • Re: Could someone of the s390 porters have a look at s390-tools Andreas Tille
  • RE: Could someone of the s390 porters have a look at s390-tools Pranav P
  • Re: Could someone of the s390 porters have a look at s390-tools Andreas Tille
  • RE: Could someone of the s390 porters have a look at s390-tools Pranav P
  • Re: Could someone of the s390 porters have a look at s390-tools Andreas Tille
  • RE: Could someone of the s390 porters have a look at s390-tools Pranav P
• Bug#1124430: node-jquery-validation: Please fix autopkgtest failures on riscv64 & s390x Fab Stz
• Re: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#1124260: closed by Debian FTP Masters <[email protected]> (reply to Fabian Grünbichler <[email protected]>) (Bug#1124260: fixed in rust-rust-decimal 1.39.0-3) Peter Michael Green
• Re: Bug#1124260 closed by Debian FTP Masters <[email protected]> (reply to Fabian Grünbichler <[email protected]>) (Bug#1124260: fixed in rust-rust-decimal 1.39.0-3) Paul Gevers
  • RE: Bug#1124260 closed by Debian FTP Masters <[email protected]> (reply to Fabian Grünbichler <[email protected]>) (Bug#1124260: fixed in rust-rust-decimal 1.39.0-3) Pranav P
  • Re: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#1124260: closed by Debian FTP Masters <[email protected]> (reply to Fabian Grünbichler <[email protected]>) (Bug#1124260: fixed in rust-rust-decimal 1.39.0-3) Fabian Grünbichler
• s390x: removal of 31-bit libraries Aurelien Jarno
• Bug#1124228: libavif: Build-depends on libgav1 which build-depends on architecture-is-little-endian John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• Bug#1123869: RM: lmms [s390x] -- RoQA; requires libgig Sebastian Ramacher
• Bug#1123868: RM: qsampler [s390x] -- RoQA; required libgig Sebastian Ramacher
• Bug#1123867: RM: libgig [s390x] -- ROM; not supported on big-endian architectures Sebastian Ramacher
• Bug#1123577: nmu: mesa_25.2.8-2: +b3 on !amd64 Simon McVittie
• Bug#1123010: RM: roct-thunk-interface [armel armhf i386 mips64el mipsel riscv64 s390x] -- ROM; limiting architecture to only amd64,arm64,ppc64el M. Zhou
• Re: gimp 3 FTBFS on big-endian Jeremy Bícha
• Bug#1122205: RM: rhonabwy -- ROM; upstream is no longer maintained and depends on obsolete packages, FTBFS with gnutls 3.8.11 Nicolas Mora
• Bug#1121932: scalapack: complex number tests xcinv xzinv segfault on s390x: invalid memory reference Drew Parsons
  • Re: Bug#1121932: scalapack: complex number tests xcinv xzinv segfault on s390x: invalid memory reference Pranav P
  • Re: Bug#1121932: scalapack: complex number tests xcinv xzinv segfault on s390x: invalid memory reference Drew Parsons
  • RE: Bug#1121932: scalapack: complex number tests xcinv xzinv segfault on s390x: invalid memory reference Pranav P
• Bug#1121929: nmu: dovecot-fts-xapian_1.9.1-1.1 Noah Meyerhans
• Bug#1121916: src:scalapack: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x Paul Gevers
• OMP fixed in the llvm-21 packaging Matthias Klose
• Bug#1121707: rust-landlock: FTBFS on !x86: error[E0432]: unresolved import `self::landlock` Sebastian Ramacher
• Bug#1121477: src:ruby-murmurhash3: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x Paul Gevers
  • Re: Bug#1121477: src:ruby-murmurhash3: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x Pranav P
• Bug#1121387: src:pthreadpool: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x Paul Gevers
  • Re: src:pthreadpool: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x Paul Gevers
  • RE: src:pthreadpool: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x Pranav P
  • Re: Bug#1121387: src:pthreadpool: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x Petter Reinholdtsen
  • RE: src:pthreadpool: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x Pranav P
  • Re: src:pthreadpool: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x Paul Gevers
  • RE: src:pthreadpool: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x Pranav P
  • Re: src:pthreadpool: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x Paul Gevers
• gcc-16, first packaging bits Matthias Klose
• Bug#1121190: s390-tools: FTBFS with gcc-15 Chris Hofstaedtler
• Bug#1121149: pyroute2: autopkgtest regression on s390x Paul Gevers
• Bug#1121002: libstreamvbyte: Consider disabling the build on unsupported architectures Florent 'Skia' Jacquet
• Bug#1120809: stress-ng FTCBFS for s390x: -fmodulo-sched is not removed Helmut Grohne
  • Re: Bug#1120809: stress-ng FTCBFS for s390x: -fmodulo-sched is not removed Pranav P
  • Re: Bug#1120809: stress-ng FTCBFS for s390x: -fmodulo-sched is not removed Helmut Grohne
  • RE: Bug#1120809: stress-ng FTCBFS for s390x: -fmodulo-sched is not removed Pranav P
  • RE: Bug#1120809: stress-ng FTCBFS for s390x: -fmodulo-sched is not removed Pranav P
• Re: Bug#1120262: curl 8.14.1-2+deb13u1 flagged for acceptance Paul Gevers
  • Re: Bug#1120262: curl 8.14.1-2+deb13u1 flagged for acceptance Adrian Bunk
  • Re: Bug#1120262: curl 8.14.1-2+deb13u1 flagged for acceptance Paul Gevers
• Bug#1119870: emacs: FTBFS on s390x: Ran 7698 tests, 7394 results as expected, 1 unexpected, 303 skipped Sebastian Ramacher
• Bug#1119833: src:stress-ng: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x Paul Gevers
  • Re: Bug#1119833: src:stress-ng: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x Pranav P
  • Re: Bug#1119833: src:stress-ng: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x Pranav P
• Architecture baseline for Forky Bastian Blank
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Tony Rodriguez
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Marco d'Itri
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Jan-Daniel Kaplanski
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Simon Richter
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Tony Rodriguez
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Geert Uytterhoeven
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky kiruthikaanbusuresh
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Marcin Juszkiewicz
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Rob Landley
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Marc Haber
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Tony Rodriguez
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Rob Landley
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Aurelien Jarno
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Milan Kupcevic
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Kurt Roeckx
  • Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky) Romain Dolbeau
  • Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky) Marc Haber
  • Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky) John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
  • Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky) Diederik de Haas
  • Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky) Marc Haber
  • Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky) Diederik de Haas
  • Re: Planned obsolescence ? (OpenBSD) jbranso
  • Re: Planned obsolescence ? (OpenBSD) Paul Tagliamonte
  • Re: Planned obsolescence ? (OpenBSD) John David Anglin
  • Re: Planned obsolescence ? (OpenBSD) Philipp Kern
  • Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust) Jan-Daniel Kaplanski
  • Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust) David Starner
  • Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust) Jan-Daniel Kaplanski
  • Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust) David Starner
  • Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust) Christopher Huhn
  • Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust) Riccardo Mottola
  • Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust) Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide
  • Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust) Falco Girgis
  • Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky) John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
  • AW: Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky) Jan-Daniel Kaplanski
  • Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky) Marc Haber
  • Re: Planned obsolescence ? Riccardo Mottola
  • Re: Planned obsolescence ? Jaromír Cápík
  • Re: Planned obsolescence ? Riccardo Mottola
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky John Klos
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Sicelo
  • Re: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Hermann . Lauer
  • Re: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky John Klos
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Peter Green
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Lucas Nussbaum
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Holger Levsen
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Adrian Bunk
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Lucas Nussbaum
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Rob Landley
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Gerardo Ballabio
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• Bug#1118779: charliecloud: autopkgtest regression on s390x: seccomp root emulation failed Peter Wienemann
  • Re: Bug#1118779: charliecloud: autopkgtest regression on s390x: seccomp root emulation failed Pranav P
  • Re: Bug#1118779: charliecloud: autopkgtest regression on s390x: seccomp root emulation failed Peter Wienemann
  • RE: Bug#1118779: charliecloud: autopkgtest regression on s390x: seccomp root emulation failed Pranav P
  • RE: Bug#1118779: charliecloud: autopkgtest regression on s390x: seccomp root emulation failed Pranav P
• Bug#1118519: opentsne: autopkgtest regression on some architectures with scikit 1.7.2 Timo Röhling
• Bug#1118463: pygobject: FTBFS on 64-bit BE: "Fatal Python error: Aborted" in test_length_array_utf8_optional_inout() Simon McVittie
  • Re: Bug#1118463: pygobject: FTBFS on 64-bit BE: "Fatal Python error: Aborted" in test_length_array_utf8_optional_inout() Simon McVittie
• Re: emboss: all executables segfault on s390x Pranav P
  • Re: emboss: all executables segfault on s390x Andrius Merkys
  • RE: emboss: all executables segfault on s390x Pranav P
  • Re: emboss: all executables segfault on s390x Andrius Merkys
  • RE: emboss: all executables segfault on s390x Pranav P
  • Re: emboss: all executables segfault on s390x Andrius Merkys
  • Re: emboss: all executables segfault on s390x Andreas Tille
• Bug#1118369: RM: godot3 [armhf i386 s390x] -- NBS; Unsupported upstream Travis Wrightsman
• Bug#1117885: src:picotool: fails to migrate to testing for too long: autopkgtest failure on s390x Paul Gevers
• Bug#1117937: libcgns: test_particlef and cgwrite_f03 tests fail on many architectures Drew Parsons
• Bug#1117971: src:lua-system: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x Paul Gevers
  • Re: Bug#1117971: src:lua-system: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x Pranav P
  • Re: Bug#1117971: src:lua-system: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x Pranav P
  • Re: Bug#1117971: src:lua-system: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x Paul Gevers
  • RE: Bug#1117971: src:lua-system: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x Pranav P
• Bug#1116657: src:libgig: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x Paul Gevers
  • Re: Bug#1116657: src:libgig: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x Pranav P

• Earlier messages