On 2026-04-02 11:06:30 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > On 2025-12-19 15:00:22 +0100, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote: > > Control: tags -1 - moreinfo > > > > Hi Sebastian, > > > > * Sebastian Ramacher <[email protected]> [2025-12-19 14:54]: > > > On 2025-11-25 13:22:39 +0100, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote: > > > > Package: release.debian.org > > > > Severity: normal > > > > User: [email protected] > > > > Usertags: binnmu > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > this is an other round to get reproducibility fixes in. This is to > > > > cleanup after #1096129. > > > > > > > > > > Is there a machine-readable list (e.g. with source, version, > > > architecture, reason) on reproducible.debian.net that I can feed into > > > drt-tools to schedule them? Then I can simply schedule them > > > semi-periodocially? > > > > There is not. Thanks for the offer but the bug in dak has been fixed so I > > hope that this is the last one of such requests, unless I missed some > > packages. Ah and whenever we add s390x there will probably be an other > > round.. > > I just scheduled another round of rebuilds for r.d.n. Then I wanted to > check the state of this request again, but … > > reproducible.debian.net now points reproducible-builds.org. Where can I > check the state of the packages that you have requested to be rebuild in > this bug?
Scrap that. reproducible.d.n != reproduce.d.n Still, my questions regarding the machine readable list remains given that this was not the last request. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher
