On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 11:56:40AM +0000, Peter Green wrote: > I recently became aware that mumble's build-dependencies were no longer > satisfiable on armhf due to a missing zeroc-ice. I looked at the build > logs for zeroc-ice and all were green. So I looked at the removal log > and found the following. > > > [Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2023 17:56:51 -0000] [ftpmaster: Scott Kitterman] > > Removed the following packages from unstable: > > > > libzeroc-ice-dev | 3.7.8-2.1 | arm64, armhf > > libzeroc-ice3.7 | 3.7.8-2.1 | arm64, armhf > > libzeroc-icestorm3.7 | 3.7.8-2.1 | arm64, armhf > > mumble-server | 1.3.4-4 | arm64, armhf > > php-zeroc-ice | 3.7.8-2.1 | arm64, armhf > > python3-zeroc-ice | 3.7.8-2.1 | arm64, armhf > > zeroc-glacier2 | 3.7.8-2.1 | arm64, armhf > > zeroc-ice-compilers | 3.7.8-2.1 | arm64, armhf > > zeroc-ice-utils | 3.7.8-2.1 | arm64, armhf > > zeroc-icebox | 3.7.8-2.1 | arm64, armhf > > zeroc-icebridge | 3.7.8-2.1 | arm64, armhf > > zeroc-icegrid | 3.7.8-2.1 | arm64, armhf > > zeroc-icepatch2 | 3.7.8-2.1 | arm64, armhf > > Closed bugs: 1031160 > > > > ------------------- Reason ------------------- > > RoQA; openjfx no longer builds on arm64 and armhf, build-depends not > > available > > This strikes me as strange in a couple of ways. > > 1. The only relationships of zeroc-ice to openjfx are in build-depends-indep > and in the binary dependencies of an arch all package. Afaict it is > perfectly > normal for build-depends-indep and the binary dependencies of arch all > packages to only be satisfiable on a subset of the architectures where > 2. Only one of the two binaries from the mumble source package was removed. > > Was this removal just a mistake? or was there a reason behind it that I am not > seeing?
As requestor of #1031160 I would say this was a mistake, perhaps due to https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/openjfx Issues preventing migration: ∙ ∙ removing openjfx/11.0.11+0-1.1/arm64 from testing makes beast2-mcmc/2.7.3+dfsg-1/arm64 uninstallable ∙ ∙ removing openjfx/11.0.11+0-1.1/arm64 from testing makes josm/0.0.svn18646+dfsg-1/arm64 uninstallable ∙ ∙ removing openjfx/11.0.11+0-1.1/arm64 from testing makes pdfsam/4.3.4-1/arm64 uninstallable This will require a hint from the release team I have not yet requested, since installability of binary-all packages is tested on amd64 and arm64 but there is no requirement that a binary-all package is installable on arm64 and several are not.[1] cu Adrian [1] https://release.debian.org/britney/testing_uninst.txt
