Hi Kai!

On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 07:48:49AM +0200, Kai Pastor, DG0YT wrote:
> This patch fixes the creation of the offending timestamp, by clamping to
> SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH as specified.

Thank you for the patch and sorry for delayed response!

> I also left a link to this Debian bug in Qt's code review for the offending
> change.

Can you please share a link to the mentioned code review?

https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-62697 has only some old reviews from
2018 linked.

> Clamp registered collection time-stamp to SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH if set.
> --- a/src/assistant/help/qhelpcollectionhandler.cpp
> +++ b/src/assistant/help/qhelpcollectionhandler.cpp
> @@ -2197,7 +2197,14 @@
>      m_query->addBindValue(fileName);
>      const QFileInfo fi(absoluteDocPath(fileName));
>      m_query->addBindValue(fi.size());
> -    m_query->addBindValue(fi.lastModified().toString(Qt::ISODate));
> +    QDateTime last_modified = fi.lastModified();
> +    if (qEnvironmentVariableIsSet("SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH"))
> +    {
> +        qint64 source_date_epoch = 
> qEnvironmentVariableIntValue("SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH");
> +        if (source_date_epoch < last_modified.toSecsSinceEpoch())
> +            
> last_modified.setSecsSinceEpoch(qEnvironmentVariableIntValue("SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH"));

I think we can use setSecsSinceEpoch(source_date_epoch) here?

--
Dmitry Shachnev

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to