Your message dated Sun, 23 Aug 2020 13:33:36 +0200
with message-id <2262360.k4MpFIjEMJ@thyrus>
and subject line Re: Bug#902844: baloo-kf5: flaky autopkgtest
has caused the Debian Bug report #902844,
regarding baloo-kf5: flaky autopkgtest
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
902844: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=902844
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: baloo-kf5
Version: 5.46.0-1
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: flaky
While inspecting regressions in autopkgtest results¹, I noticed that
your package failed multiple times²³⁴⁵ without apparent changes and
passed later again. I spotted at least to two errors that I copied
below, but they are not always together, and there may be more. The last
regression was involved in delaying the migration of xorg-server.
Could you please investigate and make your autopkgtest more robust?
Please contact me if you need help and you think I can provide that (I
am not subscribed to this bug).
Recent discussion of gating migration by autopkgtests on debian-devel⁶
noted that if this is going to work, and in particular if we are going
to *block* migration when it causes autopkgtest regressions rather than
merely delaying it, intermittent autopkgtest failures are likely to have
to be considered RC due to their impact on the tested package's
dependencies; for now I've filed it as important.
Paul
¹ https://ci.debian.net/packages/b/baloo-kf5/testing/amd64/
²
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/unstable/amd64/b/baloo-kf5/497552/log.gz
³
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/unstable/amd64/b/baloo-kf5/479452/log.gz
⁴
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/unstable/amd64/b/baloo-kf5/451349/log.gz
⁵
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/b/baloo-kf5/541452/log.gz
⁶ https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2018/05/msg00061.html
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/b/baloo-kf5/541452/log.gz
23/37 Test #4: querytest ........................***Failed 0.08 sec
********* Start testing of QueryTest *********
Config: Using QtTest library 5.10.1, Qt 5.10.1
(x86_64-little_endian-lp64 shared (dynamic) release build; by GCC 7.3.0)
PASS : QueryTest::initTestCase()
PASS : QueryTest::testTermEqual()
PASS : QueryTest::testTermStartsWith()
PASS : QueryTest::testTermAnd()
FAIL! : QueryTest::testTermOr() Compared values are not the same
Loc:
[/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.fx7kbu5r/downtmp/build.XfS/src/autotests/integration/querytest.cpp(149)]
PASS : QueryTest::testTermPhrase()
PASS : QueryTest::cleanupTestCase()
Totals: 6 passed, 1 failed, 0 skipped, 0 blacklisted, 76ms
********* Finished testing of QueryTest *********
31/37 Test #28: fileindexerconfigtest ............***Failed 0.31 sec
********* Start testing of Baloo::Test::FileIndexerConfigTest *********
Config: Using QtTest library 5.10.1, Qt 5.10.1
(x86_64-little_endian-lp64 shared (dynamic) release build; by GCC 7.3.0)
------%<---------
QWARN :
Baloo::Test::FileIndexerConfigTest::testShouldFolderBeIndexedHidden(d1)
Failed enumerating UDisks2 objects:
"org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown"
"The name org.freedesktop.UDisks2 was not provided by any .service files"
FAIL! :
Baloo::Test::FileIndexerConfigTest::testShouldFolderBeIndexedHidden(d1)
Compared values are not the same
Actual (cfg->shouldFolderBeIndexed(path)): 0
Expected (shouldBeIndexed) : 1
Loc:
[/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.fx7kbu5r/downtmp/build.XfS/src/autotests/unit/file/fileindexerconfigtest.cpp(203)]
------%<---------
Totals: 93 passed, 1 failed, 0 skipped, 0 blacklisted, 294ms
********* Finished testing of Baloo::Test::FileIndexerConfigTest *********
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: baloo-kf5
Source-Version: 5.62.0-2
In data lunedì 2 luglio 2018 09:26:16 CEST, Paul Gevers ha scritto:
> While inspecting regressions in autopkgtest results¹, I noticed that
> your package failed multiple times²³⁴⁵ without apparent changes and
> passed later again. I spotted at least to two errors that I copied
> below, but they are not always together, and there may be more. The last
> regression was involved in delaying the migration of xorg-server.
>
> Could you please investigate and make your autopkgtest more robust?
The wrong autopkgtest were removed with version baloo-kf5.
Hence, closing.
Thanks,
--
Pino Toscano
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--- End Message ---
