El lun., 6 de ago. de 2018 17:23, Sandro Knauß <he...@debian.org> escribió:
> Hey, > > > That's totally understandable from your part. Now the test has clearly > > failed. The regression could either be in Qt or in some part of the KDE > PIM > > stack (not the meta package). > > ktexteditor is KDE Frameworks and not KDE PIM. For KDE PIM the argument of > not > being up-to-date and not being ready for Qt 5.11 may be/is valid. But > Framworks is uptodate with 5.47 (released in June) and it should be Qt > 5.11 > ready - So you should considering filing a bug about this regression > upstream. > /me facepalms Ah, indeed, my bad! It's frameworks, not PIM. Sorry about that. So yes, I'll file the bug. >
