Hi Thorsten,
> > It is not required.
>
> I’m parsing this as “you were not incorrect”, right?
It doesn't really matter whether you were correct or incorrect in the
past and seems a little silly to debate that; far easier and clearer
IMHO to statelessly state that clamping is not required when using
SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH. :)
> > I've found that having a shared vocabulary is very useful so just in
> > case it helps we tend to use the term "clamping" when referring to
>
> True… it’s just that I didn’t recall the word, as “clamping”
> is not something normally part of my English vocabulary […]
I might agree it's esoteric word/usage, but not only is it already "out
there", we have more problems with "reproducible" to worry about this
one too much alas.
> I’ll try to remember next time.
Again, no question of blame or apologies here… :)
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
