Your message dated Sun, 21 Jan 2018 13:23:31 +0000 with message-id <e1edfat-000ihi...@fasolo.debian.org> and subject line Bug#887821: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #840652, regarding Please consider removing src:gpgmepp from the archive to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 840652: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=840652 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: src:gpgme1.0 Subject: gpgme binding cleanup Control: clone -1 -2 src:kdepimlibs Control: retitle -2 Please stop building libgpgme++2v5 and libqgpgme1 Control: clone -1 -3 src:gpgmepp Control: retitle -3 Please consider removing src:gpgmepp from the archive Control: clone -1 -4 src:python-pyme Control: retitle -4 Please consider removing src:python-pyme from the archive Control: block -1 -2 -3 -4 X-Debbugs-Cc: Sandro Knauß <b...@sandroknauss.de>, Andre Heinecke <aheine...@gnupg.org> GnuPG's C library, GPGME, has recently adopted/absorbed some common Python, C++, and Qt bindings into their upstream project. This means that PyME, GpgMEpp, and QGpgME are all now officially part of upstream GPGME. In debian, we've uploaded gpgme 1.7.0-3 to experimental that builds the latest version of all of these bindings. In particular, it builds the following packages in addition to the stanard GPGME binaries: python-pyme python3-pyme libgpgmepp6 libqgpgme6 libgpgmepp-dev These are all stuck in NEW right now, of course :/ However, we also have several remaining copies of GPGME bindings in debian, and it would be good to reduce their number. This will save the sanity of our users; will provide better focus for upstream developers; and will be easier for us to maintain going forward. In debian, we have: * src:kdepimlibs, which builds several binary packages, including: - libgpgme++2v5 - libqgpgme1 We should be able to drop these two binary packages from the build of src:kdepimlibs; packages linking against these tools should be able to rebuild against libgpgmepp6 and libqgpgme6. This means that any build-dependencies should probably move to libgpgmepp-dev instead of kdepimlibs5-dev * src:gpgmepp, which builds several binary packages, including - libkf5gpgmepp5 - libkf5qgpgme5 We should be able to drop this entire source package from the archive. Any build dependencies should probably move to libgpgmepp-dev from libkf5gpgmepp-dev. * python-pyme, which builds the python-pyme package. This should be superceded entirely by upstream's pyme, so it can probably also be entirely removed from the archive. The reverse dependencies are the biggest concern here: a filtered view of "apt-cache rdepends libgpgme++2v5 libqgpgme1 libkf5gpgmepp5 libkf5qgpgme5" Turns up the following packages that might need to be rebuilt: kaddressbook kde-runtime kget kmymoney libkf5libkleo5 libkf5wallet-bin libkleo4 libkwalletbackend5-5 libmessagecomposer4 libmessageviewer4 One thing i note is that we have libkleo4 and libkleo5. I don't know how tightly-bound kde4 is with qt4, but it maybe we want a separate binary package of libqgpgme that is built against qt4 instead of qt5. I can look into providing that as a separate build in gpgme if that would be useful. Let me know what you think the next steps should be in proceeding with this cleanup. (or if you think we should abandon the whole thing!) --dkg
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Version: 16.04.3-2+rm Dear submitter, as the package gpgmepp has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/887821 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)
--- End Message ---
