On 2016-10-29 23:26:49 [+0200], Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 10:32:34PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > One thing that confuses me: Why has none > > of the libraries a dependency on libssl? > > From what I understand they use dlopen() and this would allow GPL > applications to use QT when they don't use OpenSSL. (QT itself > being LGPL)
Ach right. I though they do some strange symbol hinding with their define and the q_ prefix but this makes sense. So drom looking at the code they do only dlopen() so it should all good. > This is of course potentionally problematic if we have 2 versions > of openssl that get linked into the same application. Now that you mention this, #804487 is a proof of something related. > Kurt Sebastian
