On Monday 06 June 2016 20:27:22 Santiago Vila wrote: > On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 11:10:03AM -0700, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > > > This would still be a bug, right? Otherwise we would have to create a > > > new control field for this, maybe "Build-CPUs: 2". I hope not! > > > > Yes, but I doubt it would be RC as it does not affects the official > > builds. > > Feel free to downgrade to important if you wish. > > I personally do not share the idea that a bug needs to happen in the > official buildds to be RC, and I'll try to elaborate: > > Imagine a package which FTBFS with 1/2 of probability.
Not really to have an argument on this, but as long as the FTBFS happen on non-official archs it's not RC. If it FTBFSs happen in official archs then it is RC, even it if happens half of the time. But if someone can prove the bug is *really* happening due to -j1 I would concur it's RC, otherwise it might be something else. FWIW I have filed a bug against qemu for building issues in parallel builds in the past, so maybe the bug is related to qemu/kvm. -- You don’t marry someone you can live with – you marry the person who you cannot live without. Anonymous Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
