Hi Martin, On Friday 31 July 2015 22:01:03 Martin Steigerwald wrote: > Any chance for updated Akonadi 1.13 packages?
I'm not sure what exactly you are suggesting. Lately I've been working on Akonadi [1] and I'm happy to report that I believe I've managed to stabilise it. I strongly recommend to refrain from any further uploads of 1.13 unless some serious bugs are discovered. With my huge mail archive I'm in the same boat with you so I've tried latest head of 1.13 branch but found it unreliable and half-baked with multiple regressions in various backends. I selectively applied all changes that work reliably and I even had to rollback some that did not pass my tests. Testing Akonadi is a hell of an effort as it requires many hours of stressing with all three backends. Some changes in 1.13 cause unrecoverable database errors when even `akonadictl fsck` does not help. Some changes break initialisation of new database. I feel very uncomfortable about the idea of uploading any further changes to 1.13. I strongly recommend to wait till new upstream release. Meanwhile you can upgrade to akonadi/1.13.0-7 which accumulated the best improvements from 1.13 without known regressions. [1]: http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/a/akonadi/unstable_changelog -- Best wishes, Dmitry Smirnov --- There is no such thing as public opinion. There is only published opinion. -- Winston Churchill
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
