Hi David, First of all, there are two Akonadi SQLite backends: QSQLITE and QSQLITE3. Which one are you using? Can you try another one please?
On 16/07/15 01:22, David Goodenough wrote:
> There is a script that can be run (pg_upgradecluster from memory) which
> does the upgrade, but the postinst for the debs does not use it. I guess
> there may be times when you do not want it, and originally it did not always
> work (I have been using pg for a long time), but I have never had a problem
> with it other than having to run in it manually.
So what's the problem then? Besides PostgreSQL is the only RDBMS
offering data checksums...
>>> Personally I will not have MySql on my machine, I simply do not trust it.
>>
>> Bad experience or abstract theory? Just curious...
> Its rather like the difference between Access and MS-SQL, one is the
> full function, the other is a simplified version designed to make life quick
> and easy. Again this is my email system, I want something reliable and which
> follows all the SQL rules (MySql and its variants do not).
I know what you mean but it doesn't make much sense. PSQL is not
necessary more reliable and it seems that (just like many other
applications) Akonadi is fine with MySQL functionality (remember, MySQL
is a recommended backend). I see no evidence that Akonadi needs backend
with "all the SQL rules" and if you consistently follow that logic you
should eliminate SQLite as well since the latter supports even more
limited SQL dialect.
Besides MySQL have great tools like MySQL Workbench and others...
> There was talk of an Akonadi2,
You suppose you meant this:
https://community.kde.org/KDE_PIM/Akonadi_Next
--
Regards,
Dmitry Smirnov
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
