On 01/06/2015 08:59 PM, Francesco Muzio wrote:
> I just wanted to point out a lack of compatibility between the KDM and
> systemd. This before to know that SDDM will be the new replacement of KDM
But it works here after a fresh install. If there was an actual
incompatibility with kdm on systemd, this would be actually a serious
bug. But that isn't the case as you can see:
root@jessie64:~> systemctl status kdm.service
● kdm.service - LSB: X display manager for KDE
Loaded: loaded (/etc/init.d/kdm)
Drop-In: /run/systemd/generator/kdm.service.d
└─50-kdm-$x-display-manager.conf
Active: active (running) since Tue 2015-01-06 22:08:55 CET; 8min ago
Process: 913 ExecStart=/etc/init.d/kdm start (code=exited,
status=0/SUCCESS)
CGroup: /system.slice/kdm.service
├─ 963 /usr/bin/kdm -config /var/run/kdm/kdmrc
├─ 965 /usr/bin/X :0 vt7 -br -nolisten tcp -auth
/var/run/xauth/A:0-ipCFlb
├─1001 -:0
└─1002 /usr/lib/kde4/libexec/kdm_greet
Jan 06 22:08:55 jessie64 kdm[913]: Starting K Display Manager: kdm.
Jan 06 22:08:55 jessie64 systemd[1]: Started LSB: X display manager for KDE.
Jan 06 22:08:59 jessie64 kdm_greet[1002]: Cannot load
/usr/share/kde4/apps/kdm/faces/.default.face: No...tory
Hint: Some lines were ellipsized, use -l to show in full.
root@jessie64:~>
I assume we can close the bug then?
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
`- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54ac51a2.8040...@physik.fu-berlin.de
