severity 757369 important thanks Hi Wookey! First of all, congratulations for getting arm64 as an official arch! :)
On Sunday 10 August 2014 03:41:41 Wookey wrote: [snip] > qtwebkit does not build on arm64 (which is (just) now in the main > archive). The simple attached patch fixes this issue. Actually to the best of my knowledge qt4-x11 never built on arm64, so there is no way qtwebkit could have built there. So I'm downgrading the severity of this bug. > It was actually > done a couple of months ago but I apparently failed to file this bug, > mostly because there were two versions upstream and I thought I should > check both out. We are trying to switch to a newer version, indeed. Concerning the patch it totally looks OK, and due to it's simplicity I'll try to push that myself to upstream (you now, the CLA thing). > I see there has been an NMU since then. I'll check that this still > works OK with that. Then plan to do an NMU in order to unblock arm64 builds. Which has been announced as a 5 days delay (too short) and pushed *without delay* to the archive. I would recommend you to not follow those bad examples. Moreover, except something has changed an rmadison is not showing me the correct results, this is not an RC bug. Kinds regards, Lisandro. -- Quizá, para muchos, ahora que lo pienso, Wikipedia tiene ciertamente un defecto imperdonable. No adorna. Ariel Torres, "Probablemente, la Wikipedia esté bien" La Nación Tecnología, Sábado 25 de agosto de 2007 http://www.lanacion.com.ar/tecnologia/nota.asp?nota_id=937889 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
