On 22/04/13 11:29, Richard Dale wrote: > Hi Maximiliano > > On 04/22/2013 09:56 AM, Maximiliano Curia wrote: >> ¡Hola! >> >> Packaging qyoto for Debian we have found a number of files that have a >> Qt Preview licenses agreement disclaimer and no reference to a LGPL license >> option. Making those files non-free, so they would have to be removed from >> the >> debian packages. >> >> Which is kind of sad, knowing that the software which is based on have had >> diffrent licenses over the time. >> >> The files are mostly uic related, and it would be great if we could port the >> changes made to a LGPL released version of uic. Would you consider that >> feasible? > > Yes, I think all of these headers should have an LGPL copyright notice > in them - the preview license inclusion is just an oversight. Arno wrote > most of the Qyoto uic I think and so the final word is with him, but I > personally agree they should be changed. The sources are from Qt 4.2 IIRC, so the code for uic should normally be GPL. To be honest, I don't know why those files have a Qt Preview license header. Guess I just skipped over the header back then. If it is legally possible to just change the license to (L)GPL, I'm all for that, but I'm no lawyer. Is this legally okay?
-- Arno Rehn -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51752082.4020...@arnorehn.de
