On Monday 15 October 2012 09.49.37 Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > On Sunday 14 October 2012 02:21 AM, Salvo Tomaselli wrote: > > This would defeat the idea of having /tmp on ram! > > Yes. But it is unclear on how to handle applications that could be > writing ever growing data. True. But for now the standard on new installations is to have /tmp on disk. If someone changes it, then it's his business to deal with the consequences.
-- Salvo Tomaselli
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
