On Sat, 2012-08-11 at 22:43 +0800, YunQiang Su wrote: > I update my system (Sid) just mow, and got some errors due to BinNUM of QT.
and have you discussed this with the maintainers, who requested the binNMU? (CCed) > I aware of the technical debate on multiarch and binnum, it seems that all > guys > there have their sufficient arguments. It's great technical debate, WHILE: > > The problem is there unsloved, and USERs are using my system, and > We know exactly that the binnum of some packages will broken system certainly. There's no need to shout. It really doesn't help your point. If you're running a multi-user system and basing it on sid, you really have to expect some breakage, multi-arch or not. > Why we still BinNMU these packages before this problem completely resolved? > > Must we? Well it avoids tying up several hours of buildd time on architectures not affected by the issue the binNMU was scheduled for (i.e. 9/14). Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1344698302.2978.48.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
