n Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 8:39 PM, Modestas Vainius <mo...@debian.org> wrote: > severity 613522 wishlist > tags 613522 wontfix > unblock 590147 by 613522 > thanks > > Hello, > > On antradienis 15 Vasaris 2011 15:11:24 Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: >> Package: akregator >> Version: 4:4.4.7-3 >> Severity: serious >> >> Please use separate source for metakit. Serious because it is code >> duplication, lead to dataloss and moreover package is outdated. > > Your reasons for serious are just wrong. There is NO metakit source package in > Debian so there is NO dublication. What is more, metakit library is hopelessly > outdated upstream (2007 is the latest release date) and there is no proof that > new version would fix current akregator problems. Actually, the metakit lib > that is currently embedded in the akregator (2.4.9.5), has no interesting > changes in comparison with the current metakit stable release (2.4.9.7) (yes, > I have actually checked). So please do not exagerate bug severities based on > pure guesses. You could have saved some valuable time for everybody. > > Future is akonadi-based akregator and, obviously, we are not interested in > maintaining a dead library just for the sake of it.
I will maintain it, I have taken ownership of metakit and intent to package. I will also investigate how to avoid segv. When metakit will hit unstable are you willing to use the .so lib ? > Moreover, unless you can actually confirm the fix for 590147, do not add false > information to the BTS. > P.S. Users should never set serious severity unless they can pin point Debian > policy violation. You obviously failed to do so in this case. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTinLbgQzXk5OJQmQ0DdD7s_irW9=f8k538pko...@mail.gmail.com
