tags 585136 wontfix thanks Hello,
On trečiadienis 09 Birželis 2010 16:16:37 Marc Pignat wrote: > I think there is a problem with reporting bugs with DrKonqi. > > DrKonqi fills bugs upstream, but the Debian policy is to fill bug using the > Debian BTS. > > As a side effect, we can see the bug count for DebianKde is falling (at > least on the yearly graph > (http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org/kdebuggraph.html). That's only thanks to a couple of people who patiently devoted their time to clean up the Debian BTS. If your "suggestion" was implemented, bug count would be going up without anything upstream-related getting fixed. We rarely do anything about non-RC upstream issues. > I think either drkonqi or the documentation of BTS should be fixed. Debian KDE team policy is to suggest users report KDE upstream bugs (non- packaging bugs) to https://bugs.kde.org/ . We are thankful that there is DrKonqi which does that. Users are free to report upstream bugs to Debian BTS but they typically go unanswered. So what's better? -- Modestas Vainius <modes...@vainius.eu>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
