control: tags -1 + upstream wontfix
Dear Patrick, Le 5 novembre 2025 08:20:47 GMT+01:00, "Patrick Häcker" <[email protected]> a écrit : >Dear Maintainer, Dear Patrick, thanks for your bug report. You're not the only one bothered by this change, the issue has also been reported as #1118361 [1]. >Although removing this feature was a deliberate decision from upstream >(although obviously from developers not using the feature themself) the >reasons are not convincing to me. It basically boils down to: "It does not >work in all possible situations, so it is better to never work at all". > >This makes the whole package mostly useless beyond the simplest of use >cases. For the simplest of use cases, however, virtual desktops are good >enough, so activities are not needed. Therefore, this change effectively >makes the package useless. > >Therefore, I suggest that Debian corrects the upstream decision for the >Debian packages by reverting 690d377810f775b0e4e7512f9516c8a9ba123d4f. Unfortunately that's more of a divergence than we're willing to maintain in Debian downstream as the already pretty thin stretched Qt/KDE Team. So if the feature is that important to your workflow I would advise engaging constructively with upstream around that workflow to find a better way to bring back what you need. Like you I don't like the decision since I was using the feature, but unlike you I share the concerns raised by upstream about its previous behaviour and think they would need to be addressed from a design standpoint before moving forward. I think nested session management is a pretty difficult topic, since handling session management properly is already a topic of its own. And if I were to dedicate resource on the topic I would prioritise ensuring the best session management features are enabled in all apps (think proper app state restore) and also in the Wayland session before working on nested setups. [1] <https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1118361> Happy hacking, -- Aurélien
