Package: kimageformat6-plugins Version: 6.13.0-2 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]
Dear Maintainer, I've upgraded the image management digikam, a kde application, which relies on QT. Digikam developers have switched from PNG to WEBP during the upgrade (I think it was from 8.6.0 to 8.7.0). Since then some functions using WEBP don't work. (The easiest way to reproduce is to check if digikam still displays the "splash-screen" on startup. In the bug I filed on digikam (https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=509633) the developers claim that they use QT libs for loading WEBP. QT does support WEBP, only if support is added at compile time. Would it be possible to do this? I am not entirely shure that kimageformat6-plugins is the correct package to file the bug against. There is simply too much kde and qt for me to understand it. -- System Information: Debian Release: forky/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'oldstable-updates'), (500, 'oldstable-security'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (500, 'oldstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 6.11.0-112021-tuxedo (SMP w/16 CPU threads; PREEMPT) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_WARN, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled Versions of packages kimageformat6-plugins depends on: ii libavif16 1.3.0-1 ii libc6 2.41-12 ii libgcc-s1 15.2.0-1 ii libheif-plugin-j2kdec 1.20.2-2 ii libheif-plugin-libde265 1.20.2-2 ii libheif-plugin-x265 1.20.2-2 ii libheif1 1.20.2-2 ii libimath-3-1-29t64 3.1.12-1+b3 ii libjxl0.11 0.11.1-4 ii libkf6archive6 6.13.0-2 ii libopenexr-3-1-30 3.1.13-2 ii libopenjp2-7 2.5.3-2.1 ii libqt6core6t64 6.8.2+dfsg-9 ii libqt6gui6 6.8.2+dfsg-9 ii libqt6printsupport6 6.8.2+dfsg-9 ii libraw23t64 0.21.4-2 ii libstdc++6 15.2.0-1 kimageformat6-plugins recommends no packages. kimageformat6-plugins suggests no packages. -- no debconf information
