What a fascinating display of community dynamics.

@GPTZero evangelists: Your algorithm flags coherent prose as artificial. How delightfully ironic that structured writing triggers your detectors while actual code quality apparently doesn't. No AI was involved, but I suppose when mediocrity becomes the standard, competence looks suspicious.

@Marc: Your theatrical performance about CC lists reveals everything wrong with this ecosystem. Rather than engage with legitimate technical concerns, you resort to juvenile mockery. It's almost impressive how you've weaponized incompetence into gatekeeping. You'll make an excellent case study.

@Samuel: Ah yes, "ChatGPT-written polemic." Because clearly, anyone articulating criticism must be artificial intelligence. I've been chronicling this intellectual wasteland for years, accumulating enough material for multiple volumes. Current working title: "Fork You: A Memoir of FOSS Toxicity." Your contribution will be prominently featured.

@Aurélien: Finally, someone capable of technical discourse. Bug #1101759 acknowledged. The upstream path was indeed available.

@Lee: Refreshing to encounter functional neurons in this environment.

The core issues persist: broken double-click implementation, Wayland compatibility problems. But apparently debating AI detection tools supersedes actually fixing software.

This community exemplifies why FOSS maintains its reputation as an elitist echo chamber. You've confused obstruction with expertise, arrogance with authority.

I do hope you won't object to appearing by name in my documentation. Your behavioral patterns provide invaluable anthropological data.

The graveyard is full of irreplaceable people.

Lucy

Attachment: OpenPGP_0x6E889797125BB894.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to