Hej Helge, Am Samstag, 4. Januar 2025, 16:08:05 MEZ schrieb Helge Deller: > Package: kalarm > Version: 4:24.12.0-2 > Tags: ftbfs > Usertags: hppa armel armhf i386 > > kalarm fails in some testcases on 32-bit platforms like this: > > FAIL! : KADateTimeTest::constructors() Compared values are not the > same Actual (datetimeTz.qDateTime()) : 2001/02/13 > 11:45:14.000[GMT] Expected (dtLocal.toTimeZone(london)): 2001/02/13 > 03:45:14.000[GMT] Loc: > [./src/kalarmcalendar/autotests/kadatetimetest.cpp(457)] > > In debian/rules this line: > testsuite_failing_archs := armel armhf i386 > disables the checks on the mentioned platforms (why were the others > like m68k, powerpc and such left out?). But this just hides a problem > I assume. > > Does anyone has an idea why those tests fail? > Has someone already analyzed? > Is it related to the time64 transition?
I doubt anyone has seriously looked at the test failures. We just don't have the resources to investigate that. The reason why only some archs were explicitly mentioned is because they are release architectures and the package otherwise wouldn't migrate to testing. I guess no one really cared about kalarm on m68k and the likes. -- Med vänliga hälsningar Patrick Franz
