Hi, mea from debian-desktop finish backporting KDE 3.5 to etch (ppc) and sarge (x86). But the sarge packages still have some bugs. The qt libs are named libqt3-mt in sid and etch, while they are names libqt3c102-mt in sarge.
That`s why my question. Should the qt package be renamed, or is it possible to add an provides statement into the control file? Here is an example: Package: libqt3-mt Version: 3:3.3.5-1mea1 Section: libs Priority: optional Architecture: i386 Depends: libaudio2, libc6 (>= 2.3.2.ds1-21), libfontconfig1 (>= 2.3.0), libfreetype6 (>= 2.1.5-1), libgcc1 (>= 1:3.4.1-3), libice6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), libjpeg62, libmng1 (>= 1.0.3-1), libpng12-0 (>= 1.2.8rel), libsm6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), libstdc++5 (>= 1:3.3.4-1), libx11-6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), libxcursor1 (>> 1.1.2), libxext6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), libxft2 (>> 2.1.1), libxi6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), libxinerama1, libxrandr2 | xlibs (>> 4.3.0), libxrender1, libxt6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), zlib1g (>= 1:1.2.1), fontconfig Suggests: libqt3-mt-psql, libqt3-mt-mysql, libqt3-mt-odbc Conflicts: libqui1-emb, libqt3c-mt Replaces: qt3-tools (<< 2:3.0.2-20020306-1), libqt3-helper, libqt3 Provides: libqt3c102-mt Is this ok? Of course it can`t, because a can`t install these packages :-( Is anybody familiar with backporting? thx manne -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]