Your message dated Sun, 29 Aug 2004 15:19:00 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#268758: Renaming a large (maildir) mailbox is slow
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Aug 2004 23:29:51 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Aug 28 16:29:51 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from out006pub.verizon.net (out006.verizon.net) [206.46.170.106] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1C1Cdr-0003jc-00; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 16:29:51 -0700
Received: from cerebus.burrows.local ([207.68.118.100])
          by out006.verizon.net
          (InterMail vM.5.01.06.06 201-253-122-130-106-20030910) with ESMTP
          id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
          Sat, 28 Aug 2004 18:29:50 -0500
Received: from [192.168.1.209] (helo=[127.0.0.1])
        by cerebus.burrows.local with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
        id 1C1CeO-00078d-00; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 19:30:24 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Renaming a large (maildir) mailbox is slow
Bcc: Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.64
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 19:29:49 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out006.verizon.net from 
[207.68.118.100] at Sat, 28 Aug 2004 18:29:50 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: kmail
Version: 4:3.3.0-2
Severity: normal

  It appears that kmail renames a mailbox by creating a new mailbox,
then moving each message of the old mailbox to the new mailbox.  I say
this because renaming a somewhat large mailbox (containing about 4000
messages) takes around a minute of hard drive thrashing on my computer.

  Since the messages are just files in the filesystem, I suggest that it
would be worthwhile for kmail to avail itself of the rename(2) system
call, and to use it on the mailbox directory (ie: don't move every
message file individually!).

  Daniel

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.7
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US)

Versions of packages kmail depends on:
ii  kdelibs4                  4:3.3.0-1.1    KDE core libraries
ii  libc6                     2.3.2.ds1-16   GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc1                   1:3.4.1-7      GCC support library
ii  libice6                   4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libkcal2                  4:3.3.0-2      KDE calendaring library
ii  libkdenetwork2            4:3.3.0-2      KDE Network library
ii  libkdepim1                4:3.3.0-2      KDE PIM library
ii  libkleopatra0             4:3.3.0-2      KDE GnuPG interface libraries
ii  libkpimidentities1        4:3.3.0-2      KDE PIM user identity information 
ii  libksieve0                4:3.3.0-2      KDE mail/news message filtering li
ii  libmimelib1               4:3.3.0-2      KDE mime library
ii  libpng12-0                1.2.5.0-7      PNG library - runtime
ii  libqt3c102-mt             3:3.3.3-4      Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v
ii  libsm6                    4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System Session Management
ii  libstdc++5                1:3.3.4-9      The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libx11-6                  4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxext6                  4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  perl                      5.8.4-2        Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 
ii  xlibs                     4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System client libraries m
ii  zlib1g                    1:1.2.1.1-7    compression library - runtime

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 268758-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Aug 2004 19:19:15 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 29 12:19:15 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from out005pub.verizon.net (out005.verizon.net) [206.46.170.143] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1C1VCs-00041R-00; Sun, 29 Aug 2004 12:19:14 -0700
Received: from jester.burrows.local ([207.68.118.100])
          by out005.verizon.net
          (InterMail vM.5.01.06.06 201-253-122-130-106-20030910) with ESMTP
          id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
          Sun, 29 Aug 2004 14:19:14 -0500
From: Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Adeodato =?iso-8859-1?q?Sim=F3?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#268758: Renaming a large (maildir) mailbox is slow
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 15:19:00 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.7
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  boundary="nextPart60775843.mZXTml6gHz";
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out005.verizon.net from 
[207.68.118.100] at Sun, 29 Aug 2004 14:19:14 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

--nextPart60775843.mZXTml6gHz
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Sunday 29 August 2004 12:36 pm, you wrote:
>   perhaps you were renaming a folder that lacked those indexes, and thus
>   the hard drive activity was the result of this and not of the rename
>   action?

  Hm, that sounds plausible.  Sorry for the false alarm.

  Daniel

=2D-=20
/-------------------- Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ----------------=
=2D--\
|                       I haven't lost my mind,                            =
   |
|                       I know exactly where I left it.                    =
   |
\---- Be like the kid in the movie!  Play chess! -- http://www.uschess.org =
=2D--/

--nextPart60775843.mZXTml6gHz
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBBMiwtch6xsM7kSXgRApziAKDfGTyOTD7z1TkJc2YnfoCdwh6haACgvfT0
/eFNyJ4lGOPqY/MxzDIqD1Q=
=JcKS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart60775843.mZXTml6gHz--

Reply via email to