Your message dated Fri, 23 Apr 2004 04:30:02 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line package juk build-depends on gcc-3.2/g++-3.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Mar 2004 09:53:14 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 06 01:53:14 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AzYUb-00027Z-00; Sat, 06 Mar 2004 01:53:13 -0800
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA20698
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 6 Mar 2004 10:48:07 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id i269m6JZ022048
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 6 Mar 2004 10:48:06 +0100 (MET)
Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2004 10:48:06 +0100 (MET)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: package juk build-depends on gcc-3.2/g++-3.2
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_05
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_05
X-Spam-Level:
Package: juk
The juk package currently build-depends on gcc-3.2/g++-3.2 instead
of the default gcc/g++ packages/compilers.
Please check if/that the package can be built using the default gcc/g++.
If the packages fails to build, please recheck with the gcc-snapshot
package.
In the case of build failures, please add the preprocessed source to
the report. The severity of the report will become serious once gcc-3.2
is removed from the distribution.
Thanks, Matthias
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 236443-done) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Apr 2004 09:30:25 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 23 02:30:25 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pico.surpasshosting.com [66.194.152.191]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGx0r-0006Ci-00; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 02:30:25 -0700
Received: from [208.180.235.136] (helo=calc-amd64)
by pico.surpasshosting.com with esmtp (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.24)
id 1BGx0m-0005xy-1M
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 05:30:20 -0400
Received: from ccheney by calc-amd64 with local (Exim 4.32)
id 1BGx0U-0001kb-2q
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 04:30:02 -0500
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 04:30:02 -0500
From: Chris Cheney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: package juk build-depends on gcc-3.2/g++-3.2
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3gNIKMlg37D5iFb5"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any
abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - pico.surpasshosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - bugs.debian.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - cheney.cx
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1
--3gNIKMlg37D5iFb5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
This bug is fixed with the kdemultimedia 3.2.2-1 that is in sid. It
should migrate to sarge around Apr 26-27.
Thanks,
Chris
--3gNIKMlg37D5iFb5
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAiOIa0QZas444SvIRArgCAJ4hz4yRDye5EpMDp/hwyAVehDMo4wCdEWIP
pfxPjxZKE/pLZdoPeadtvMc=
=eSZ4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--3gNIKMlg37D5iFb5--
