Your message dated Sat, 17 Apr 2004 23:10:50 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#244254: kde: Ambiguous version number
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Apr 2004 16:00:22 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 17 09:00:22 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cpe00907f123035-cm023459901411.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com
(localhost) [24.157.67.13]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BEsEv-0004kp-00; Sat, 17 Apr 2004 09:00:22 -0700
Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id E8CD5C034; Sat, 17 Apr 2004 11:59:50 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Bruce Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: kde: Ambiguous version number
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.56
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 11:59:50 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1
Package: kde
Severity: minor
Tags: sid
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.4
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
The version number on the metapackage "kde" is 3.1.5.
The long description, however, includes in its list of modules on which
kde depends a module --- kdepim --- which was introduced only when KDE
3.2.0 was released. It would therefore appear that the metapackage has
had to be modified and the version number should have been incremented.
It is most _confusing_ to a user if the metapackage version number and the
release which the metapackage "pulls in" are different.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 244254-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Apr 2004 04:11:25 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 17 21:11:25 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pico.surpasshosting.com [66.194.152.191]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BF3eP-0006U3-00; Sat, 17 Apr 2004 21:11:25 -0700
Received: from conr-adsl-cheney.txucom.net ([207.70.165.48] helo=calc-amd64)
by pico.surpasshosting.com with esmtp (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.24)
id 1BF3e3-0004Uv-Ts; Sun, 18 Apr 2004 00:11:04 -0400
Received: from ccheney by calc-amd64 with local (Exim 4.31)
id 1BF3dq-0002QS-LF; Sat, 17 Apr 2004 23:10:50 -0500
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 23:10:50 -0500
From: Chris Cheney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Bruce Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#244254: kde: Ambiguous version number
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pFej7zHSL6C5fFIz"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any
abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - pico.surpasshosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - bugs.debian.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - cheney.cx
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1
--pFej7zHSL6C5fFIz
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 11:59:50AM -0400, Bruce Miller wrote:
> Package: kde
> Severity: minor
> Tags: sid
>=20
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: testing/unstable
> APT prefers unstable
> APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
> Architecture: i386 (i686)
> Kernel: Linux 2.6.4
> Locale: LANG=3DC, LC_CTYPE=3DC
>=20
> The version number on the metapackage "kde" is 3.1.5.
It is not... The version number for the kde metapackage is 3.1.2.
> The long description, however, includes in its list of modules on which
> kde depends a module --- kdepim --- which was introduced only when KDE
> 3.2.0 was released. It would therefore appear that the metapackage has
> had to be modified and the version number should have been incremented.
The metapackage kdepim has existed since the KDE 3.0.0 debs.
> It is most _confusing_ to a user if the metapackage version number and the
> release which the metapackage "pulls in" are different.
I plan to bump the version number once meta-kde depends on something
specific to kde 3.2 currently it does not depend on anything specific
to kde 3.2 and in fact it hasn't even been uploaded since KDE 3.2 has
been released.
Chris
--pFej7zHSL6C5fFIz
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAgf/K0QZas444SvIRAumvAJ0SrQYxQTfksqqI7SLcMOKu89niFACdHlXg
NuLomwFdLm+sStBraqagOcM=
=8FVi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--pFej7zHSL6C5fFIz--
