Your message dated Sun, 11 Jan 2004 12:17:26 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line kdelibs4: kdelibs4: Depends: libxslt1 (>= 1.0.33) but it is
not installable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jan 2004 00:56:20 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 10 18:55:55 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smallone.mmjgroup.com (smallone.fc.hp.com) [192.34.35.45]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AfMdz-0007JU-00; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 11:11:27 -0600
Received: by smallone.fc.hp.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id D1B251BD93; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 10:11:26 -0700 (MST)
From: LaMont Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: kdelibs4: kdelibs4: Depends: libxslt1 (>= 1.0.33) but it is not
installable
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 10:11:26 -0700 (MST)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
X-Spam-Level:
Package: kdelibs4
Version: 4:3.1.4-3
Severity: serious
% apt-get -udy install libxslt1
Package libxslt1 has no available version, but exists in the database.
This typically means that the package was mentioned in a dependency and
never uploaded, has been obsoleted or is not available with the contents
of sources.list
However the following packages replace it:
libxslt1.1
E: Package libxslt1 has no installation candidate
Looks like kde needs to be rebuilt using libxslt1.1, rather than libxslt1.
lamont
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux smallone.mmjgroup.com 2.4.23-pa2 #25 SMP Wed Dec 3
13:57:27 MST 2003 parisc64 GNU/Linux
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 227083-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jan 2004 17:19:27 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 11 11:19:18 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from relay01.ladot.com [217.22.66.36]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Afdax-0000ql-00; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 05:17:27 -0600
Received: from zensunni.xinara.org (unknown [217.22.72.48])
by relay01.ladot.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89DB622FA7
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 12:17:26 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ray by zensunni.xinara.org with local (Exim 4.30)
id 1Afdaw-0000Cg-Bp
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 12:17:26 +0100
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 12:17:26 +0100
From: "J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: kdelibs4: kdelibs4: Depends: libxslt1 (>= 1.0.33) but it is not
installable
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Ray at home
X-System: Debian GNU/Linux testing/unstable, kernel 2.4.25-pre4
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Sender: "J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
X-Spam-Level:
On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 10:11:26 -0700, LaMont Jones wrote:
> Looks like kde needs to be rebuilt using libxslt1.1, rather than libxslt1.
Nope. libxslt 1.1.2-2 (still in incoming for some archs) brings back a
libxslt1 package; see #227083.
I'm taking the liberty of closing this report.
Ray
--
Do Microsoft's TCO calculations include TC of downtime?
