Your message dated Wed, 31 Dec 2003 04:11:08 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line There is now
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Jul 2003 10:41:29 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 28 05:41:27 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from everest.mathematik.uni-tuebingen.de [134.2.62.220]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19h5RX-0008Pd-00; Mon, 28 Jul 2003 05:41:27 -0500
Received: from sinai.mathematik.uni-tuebingen.de
(sinai.mathematik.uni-tuebingen.de [134.2.62.228])
by everest.mathematik.uni-tuebingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
id BB6B93B8FA; Mon, 28 Jul 2003 12:41:25 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by sinai.mathematik.uni-tuebingen.de (Postfix, from userid 1234)
id 74FB385414; Mon, 28 Jul 2003 12:41:25 +0200 (CEST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15"
From: Oliver Bausinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: kdebase-bin: missing pam service
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.20
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 12:41:25 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_20,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: kdebase-bin
Version: 4:3.1.2-1.1
Severity: normal
Hi,
kdebase's configure establishes the following pam services:
kdm, kcheckpass, kscreensaver. But there's no package that has
/etc/pam.d/kscreensaver.
Therefore my kdesktop_lock doesn't work. This is strange because
it should call kcheckpass to verify it's password, but this doesn't work
for me. Instead if I provide a /etc/pam.d/kscreensaver, it works.
Might this be related to the ldap stuff?
My /etc/pam.d/{kcheckpass,kscreensaver}:
auth sufficient /lib/security/pam_ldap.so
auth requisite /lib/security/pam_unix.so use_first_pass
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux sinai 2.4.21-2-k7 #1 Sat Jul 5 03:47:02 EST 2003 i686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Versions of packages kdebase-bin depends on:
ii kdelibs4 4:3.1.2-2.1 KDE core libraries
ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.13-1 Library of functions for 2D graphi
ii libc6 2.3.1-17 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libfam0c102 2.6.10-1 client library to control the FAM
ii libgcc1 1:3.3.1-0rc1 GCC support library
ii libpam0g 0.76-13 Pluggable Authentication Modules l
ii libpng12-0 1.2.5.0-4 PNG library - runtime
ii libqt3c102-mt 3:3.1.1-9 Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v
ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.1-0rc1 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii libxrender1 0.8.2-1 X Rendering Extension client libra
ii xlibs 4.2.1-9 X Window System client libraries
ii zlib1g 1:1.1.4-14 compression library - runtime
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 203185-done) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Dec 2003 04:04:57 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 30 22:04:57 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from nibbel.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be [134.58.240.41]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AbWlJ-0002HA-00; Tue, 30 Dec 2003 21:11:09 -0600
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by nibbel.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id B110B4B5CE
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 31 Dec 2003 04:11:08 +0100 (CET)
Received: from antonius.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (antonius.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be
[134.58.240.73])
by nibbel.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B6134BA9B
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 31 Dec 2003 04:11:08 +0100 (CET)
Received: from appel (domi.kotnet.org [10.0.57.168])
by antonius.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C3B64C0D1
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 31 Dec 2003 04:11:08 +0100 (CET)
Received: from domi by appel with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1AbWlI-0000nM-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 31 Dec 2003 04:11:08 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: There is now
From: Dominique Devriese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 04:11:08 +0100
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Reasonable Discussion,
linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: Dominique Devriese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by KULeuven Antivirus Cluster
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_29
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_29
X-Spam-Level:
Hi,
This bug was fixed in 3.1.3 or 3.1.4
cheers
domi
