On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 11:37:06AM +0100, Dominique Devriese wrote: > > Hi, > > Sorry that I'm back here whining again, but I don't think we can > afford to keep this new serious kdm.postinst bug [1] in the packages > for a few months as before. > > Chris, what are your plans on this ? When do you plan to do a new > upload for this ? I can understand if you wait for some more patches > to be applied first in order to not make too much uploads of the large > kdebase package, but I don't think we can afford to wait more than say > a week or so.
There appears to be another RC bug now that needs to be fixed as well, which I unfortunately don't know how to fix. It causes kdebase to fail to build on both mips/mipsel. http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=kdebase&ver=4%3A3.1.4-1&arch=mips&stamp=1071907102&file=log&as=raw http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=kdebase&ver=4%3A3.1.4-1&arch=mipsel&stamp=1071915371&file=log&as=raw The problem file is kdebase/kcontrol/info/memory_linux.cpp In file included from ../../../kcontrol/info/memory.cpp:433, from kcm_info_la.all_cpp.cpp:3: ../../../kcontrol/info/memory_linux.cpp: In member function `void KMemoryWidget::update()': ../../../kcontrol/info/memory_linux.cpp:14: error: `SYS_sysinfo' undeclared (first use this function) ../../../kcontrol/info/memory_linux.cpp:14: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in.) make[4]: *** [kcm_info_la.all_cpp.lo] Error 1 /usr/include/bits/syscall.h defines SYS_sysinfo on most archs though so is this a bug in glibc for mips/mipsel? Or should the code be using sys/sysinfo.h instead of bits/syscall.h? Andrew Suffield mentioned it probably should be using "sysinfo(&info)" instead of using syscall. Does that sound correct to you? IMHO we should fix this problem in the next upload as well. Thanks, Chris
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
