Your message dated Mon, 11 Apr 2005 23:29:06 +0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#239306: Out of date according to submitter
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Mar 2004 07:08:25 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 21 23:08:25 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from natsmtp01.rzone.de [81.169.145.166] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1B5JXt-0004iZ-00; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 23:08:25 -0800
Received: from praenki.haegar.home (dsl-213-023-245-087.arcor-ip.net 
[213.23.245.87])
        by post.webmailer.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2M78M0t009856
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 08:08:23 +0100 (MET)
Subject: Problems with KPRINTER and CUPS
From: Marc Hecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 08:08:22 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: kdeprint
Version: 3.2.1-1


kprinter exits with konsole msg: "Alarm clock" when used in combination
with CUPSYS << 1.1.20

Solutuion: Creating a new dependency?




---------------------------------------
Received: (at 239306-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Apr 2005 20:29:08 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 11 13:29:08 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from uittosatama.fi [217.30.179.138] (postfix)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DL5Wu-0004mF-00; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 13:29:08 -0700
Received: by uittosatama.fi (Postfix, from userid 573)
        id D1F65EE807D; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 23:29:06 +0300 (EEST)
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 23:29:06 +0300
From: Riku Voipio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#239306: Out of date according to submitter
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-message-flag: Warning: message not sent with a DRM-Certified client
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

kdelibs4 depends now on libcupsys2-gnutls10 (>= 1.1.23-1), so this
dependency issue is done.

On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 05:10:30AM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> Here's what the submitter replied in private. Obviously, the bug can be 
> closed :
> 
>    Hi, Filipus,
> 
>    gee, it took some time to remember, what the problem actually was.
>    The way I
>    recall it, it's been that kdeprint was caused to hang itself with an
>    old
>    version of cupsys, right? I think it was version 1.1.17 or so.
> 
>     > BTW, I forwarded you a mail that wasn't meant for you. Sorry
>     >>Cupsys isn't a dependency of kdeprint,
>    Exactly. Probably because of kdeprint's ability to work with several
>    print
>    systems. All I meant to say was that it might be a good idea to have a
>    "requests" or "suggests"-dependency because obviously these two
>    versions of
>    kdeprint and cupsys weren't really getting along.
> 
>    I'not very familar with the internals of debian-packages. I just
>    think (not
>    knowing if it's technically possible) it'll be nice to have a
>    dependency the
>    way: If you try to update or install kdeprint and have cupsys
>    installed than
>    the latter should at least be version 1.1.x or higher.
> 
>     >>and the Sarge version is now 
>     >>1.1.23. Can you still reproduce this bug with a current Sarge?
>    Right now, I'm working with
>    kdeprint       3.3.2-1
>    cupsys        1.1.23-3
> 
>    and everything's working ok. So, thanks anyway.
> 
>    cya
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to