On Sat, Jan 14, 2023 at 01:52:11AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2023-01-13 19:21:58 -0500, Boyuan Yang wrote: > Otherwise, if there is a rule about the description in the case where > there is a binary package with the same name as the source package, > some filtering could be done based on the requirements. For instance, > specific strings such as "(metapackage)" (or more generally, the whole > parenthesized text) could be removed. > > > You know that the source package itself does not have a description > > field at all. > > Couldn't this be a future feature?
It already is:
https://bugs.debian.org/998165
(I don't know if distro-tracker supports it, however.)
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
More about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
