Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues <[email protected]> [26/Mar 8:50am +01] wrote: > Hi Sean, > > sorry I think I left you hanging on this one. XD > >> Seconded, but: >> >> - I wonder what you think about upgrading "If tests happen to be >> installed into a binary package, consider supporting the >> ``noinsttest`` build profile." to Policy advice by saying that it is >> *recommended* to do this? That would be a normative change. > > Fine with me. > >> - When you say "the following build profiles has been standardized" I >> will change that to "the following build profiles are standard" to >> make it clear we're standardising them by putting them in Policy, not >> that they are standardised elsewhere. > > Thank you! > >> - I think I wrote a couple of paragraphs so perhaps I could be >> Co-authored-by too? :) > > Please go ahead. Thank you for your valuable input! > >> - I will do some other minor wording fixes after committing the change. > > Thank you!
Thanks. I think this means we need one more seconder of the combination of your patch plus these changes. It might be helpful if you were to reroll your patch to include these changes. -- Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
