Thank you Rene for the explanation. Once my dictionary is ready - how do I supply it to you for packaging for Debian? The dictionary is a general hunspell dictionary, it is not necessarily limited to LibreOffice...
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 10:15 AM Rene Engelhard <r...@debian.org> wrote: > Hi, > > Am 13.07.21 um 18:34 schrieb Zeev Pekar: > > Currently this: > > https://packages.debian.org/source/buster/libreoffice-dictionaries > > <https://packages.debian.org/source/buster/libreoffice-dictionaries> > > shows: 1:6.2.0-1 ===> 6.2.0 > > > LibreOffice 6.2.0. Extra Source package just doing the dictionaries. As > you link yourself. > > While the LibreOffice itself is: 1:6.1.5-3+deb10u7 ===> 6.1.5 > > https://packages.debian.org/buster/libreoffice > > <https://packages.debian.org/buster/libreoffice> > > > LibreOffice 6.1.5. "Main" source package. > > > What is the problem? LO 6.2.0 came too late but because the dictionaries > is "just data" we risked updating it. > > > > I try to create a custom dictionary and would like to base its version > number on the official version number of the hunspell dictionary, but I > don't find the original upstream project(/clear versioning policy)... > Could you, please, assist? > > Ignore LOs version for this. The source contains the actual version of > the dicts. One reason this hack of libreoffice-dictionaries is bad. > > It is just a collection of what LibreOffice has in their tree. In > whatever version that is. The version of the packages (6.2.0 or whatever > later) is not in any way relevant for any dictionary contained therein. > > > Regards, > > > Rene > > >
